There will be a good deal of intrigue left in the audience's mind about the theme of the film, Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha Jiya, An impossible love story (2024), which are mostly left unexplored & unanswered. I don't know how any ordinary person can compete with a sexy robot, when everything you fancy can be fulfilled by a sex-bot, even though it's only at the superficial level. Our interactions, in daily working and private lives, can feel souless and flat. Human to human relationships are too messy and hard. In the future, will big multinational corporations create, "Super Intelligent Female Robot Automation or SIFRA", to sell it to consumers to own it, play with, to love it and even sleep with it? Can you imagine such discarded older models of sex-bots dumped in our rivers or recycle landfills, once it gets eventually worn-out or replaced? That is not in this film where such questions are answered. This is a very light-hearted "quirky" rom-com Hindi film. Maybe the fault is in the Ai programming?
0 Comments
"This company Prosecraft (Shaxpir) appears to have stolen a lot of books, trained an AI, and are now offering a service based on that data." For every $100 for movie/show, you are paying around $60 for the IP, marketing & advertisings; while $30 should be in production, but it's not. Production costs are around 50% or more. Except the big talent, only $4 is paid to the people working to make the final product, which CEOs are focusing on. The profits come from the IP and marketing, so CEOs don't mess with that. Clearly, it's the marketing & advertising or the production cost, which needs to come down. But CEOs want to squeeze and replace the people who make the final product, with Ai that can copy and reproduce the World's best human thoughts and choices. Do you want only Ai to make music or movies? Most people think of millionaire movie stars when they think about people who work on movies. But 99.8 percent of actors don't make a living as they entertain you. It's the same with musicians. They don't get gigs regularly or enough money, so they need residuals for their skills being used during film production. People who work on a movie/TV project get less pay upfront, but they get residuals, as long as the movie/show is popular enough to be re-played/re-watched anywhere, except streaming. These residuals become smaller & smaller as time passes. There are no residuals for streaming shows, so people cannot work on it to make a living. With Ai, corporations can pay nothing to World's best writers/musicians/actors by copying their work. CEOs plan to use Ai to replace writers, musicians and even real human faces and bodies. They want to pay $8-$20 one time, to scan your body, and the company owns your face and body forever to use in anything forever, without having to pay you. Ai will copy thoughts and skills too, sort of. Ai copies all your skills and use it forever, while paying you $8-$20 once. It can copy every script you have written and write in your style. It's already being done. This is exploitation to use or own your work without paying you. It means nobody can be an actors/writers/musicians anymore. Why should people's work be used (by corporations to make millions) without giving any pay? https://infiniteconversation.com/ |
AuthorI am interested in unfolding scene design, character design and image design; representing contemporary narrative strategy, narrative shot and narrative style. The flowing images, which combine aesthetics and ideology. NoticeThis site contains copyrighted material for purposes that constitutes 'fair use'; and has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. No fee is charged, and no money is made off this site. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Archives
February 2024
Categories |